Thursday, April 22, 2010

ICC decision on Verizon-Frontier deal abandons public interest

The Illinois Commerce Commission's (ICC) decision to approve the sale of Verizon's landline operations in Illinois to Frontier Communications could fail to protect the public interest and may jeopardize future access to high speed services.

The decision flies in the face of a very strong recommendation to deny the sale made by Illinois Administrative Law Judge Lisa M. Tapia. In a March 9 proposed order on the Verizon-Frontier application, Tapia wrote: "the proposed reorganization will diminish Frontier's ability to provide adequate, reliable, efficient, safe and least-cost public utility service; and will significantly impair Frontier's ability to raise necessary capital on reasonable terms and to maintain a reasonable capital structure…"

"We have been concerned from the beginning about the impact of this proposed merger on Frontier's financial stability given the enormous debt that it would incur," said Ron Kastner, Business Manager of Local 21, the largest IBEW telecom union in Illinois. "We are deeply disappointed that the ICC has made a ruling that contradicts the judge's recommendation."

The ICC decision means that only regulators at the West Virginia Public Service Commission (PSC) and the Federal Communications Commission have the power to stop approval of the deal.

"This is discouraging news to everyone concerned about the future of telecommunications in rural America," said Ron Collins, Vice President for CWA's District Two who has been leading the campaign against the sale in West Virginia. "We are not stopping our fight against this deal. Verizon's landlines in West Virginia cover virtually the entire state and it is the former Bell System carrier. Because of Frontier's financial weakness, the entire state of West Virginia would be affected if this deal were to close. That is very different than Verizon's and Frontier's relatively small presence in the states that have approved the transaction so far."
Union intervenors may have more comments on the ICC decision after the written order is made public.

More information about why citizens are mobilizing to stop the Verizon sale to Frontier is at: www.verizonfrontierdeal.org. For information about ending the digital divide visit: www.speedmatters.org.

Monday, April 5, 2010

West Virginia union members rally at FCC against Verizon-Frontier deal

Telecom workers, supporters rally at FCC against proposed sale of Verizon landlines to Frontier in 14-states

Members voice concerns in meetings with Commissioner Copps and FCC staff

Washington –With over 150 supporters chanting, "No more corporate greed...We need high speed!" nearly 50 CWA members who work for Verizon in West Virginia marched into the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Washington to voice their concerns about the potential sale of their state's telephone lines to much smaller Frontier Communications.

Verizon Communications is selling its landlines in West Virginia and 13 other states using a tax free loophole. Similar deals by Verizon in other states have resulted in bankruptcy, lost jobs, unmet broadband promises and poor service.

The Verizon workers traveled for over seven hours to attend the FCC rally and meetings with Commissioner Michael J. Copps and senior FCC staff.

CWA President Larry Cohen and District 2 Vice President Ron Collins lead off the meeting with Copps by providing a searing critique of the proposed sale.

"Our opposition to the proposed sale is based on one over-arching concern: Frontier is not financially fit to own and operate Verizon's landline operations, including Verizon West Virginia," said Cohen.

"As the Illinois Commerce Commission's Administrative Law Judge, the West Virginia Consumer Advocate Division and the Public Service Commission staff have all found, this deal will result in a lack of financial fitness that cannot be cured or subject to a compromise – it will simply render Frontier unfit to assume the responsibility for 4.8 million access lines serving citizens of the 14 affected states with an essential public service," said Collins.

At the meeting, members told Commissioner Copps that the proposed deal is too risky for West Virginia and the other 13 effected states.

"Frontier doesn't have the financial wherewithal to acquire operations that would triple its size. It cannot safely absorb the huge additional debt burden that comes with this deal," said Debra Shepherd, a Verizon customer consultant from Wheeling and member of CWA Local 2006. "Frontier's business model is to milk its operations in order to make excessive cash payments to its shareholders. Frontier is not now, and will not be, financially sound."

"Did Frontier actually check out the condition of Verizon's operations?" asked Rick Cox, a member from CWA Local 2011 in Clarksburg. "Let me tell you, it's in very bad shape. It's just not believable that Frontier will be able to cut expenses by 21 percent and then do a better job than Verizon which is more profitable and has much greater economies of scale."

"West Virginia already has a deep digital divide and this deal will only make it worse," said David Fox, an outside technician from Fairmont and member of CWA Local 2003. "If the Frontier sale is approved, it would seriously hinder us from achieving the FCC's new National Broadband Plan standards."

Frontier has only made modest commitments to deploy service at speeds between 1 and 3 megabits per second in Illinois, Ohio, Oregon, and Washington State. In contrast, the FCC has set a national goal of a minimum broadband speed of 4 megabits per second with at least 100 million households having access to 50 megabits per second service by 2015. Moreover, Frontier has no plans to expand beyond Verizon's existing commitments higher-speed "fiber-to-the-home" services that Verizon currently provides in portions of four states Frontier wants to acquire (Indiana, Oregon, South Carolina and Washington State).

CWA Representative Elaine Harris presented Copps with letters against the sale from West Virginia elected officials and more than five thousands signatures of citizens on petitions.

Many labor and community supporters attended the rally before the meeting. Speakers included Kenny Perdue, President, WV AFL-CIO, John Breyault, Vice President for Public Policy, Telecommunications, and Fraud, National Consumers League, Bob Erickson, International Rep., IBEW, Jimmy Gurganus, Vice President, CWA Telecommunications, Freda Williams, WV Boone County rural area customer, Ed Coyle, Executive Director, Alliance for Retired Americans, and Gary Zuckett, Executive Director, WV Citizen Action Group.

Pictures from the rally and meeting may be viewed on the Picasa photo sharing site at:
http://picasaweb.google.com/randwilson.aflcio/FCCRallyAgainstVerizonFrontierDealAndMeetingWithCommissionerCopps

The FCC's five commissioners can deny the deal if a majority determines that it isn't in the public interest. In March, an Administrative Law Judge recommended that the Illinois Commerce Commission reject the Verizon-Frontier application. Similarly, the West Virginia Public Service Commission staff and the state's consumer advocate strongly oppose the deal.

CWA or IBEW have intervened in state regulatory proceedings on the proposed sale in West Virginia, Illinois, Ohio, and Washington. Both unions are also intervenors in the case before the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC is expected to take up the case after the states have concluded their reviews.

No decision has been made yet in the proceedings before the commissions in West Virginia, Illinois and Washington State. The unions' request for a rehearing is currently pending in Ohio.

More information about why citizens are mobilizing to stop the Verizon sale to Frontier is at: www.verizonfrontierdeal.org. For information about ending the digital divide visit: www.speedmatters.org.